Tulsi Gabbard not likely to make third Democratic debate


GREAT TO SEE YOU. LEAKED EMAILS MADE IT CLEAR THAT THE 2016 DEMOCRATIC PRIMARY WAS RIGGED AGAINST BERNIE SANDERS AND IN FAVOR OF HILLARY CLINTON. NOW IT’S LOOKING LIKE THE 2020 RACE MIGHT HAVE SIMILAR PROBLEMS. TULSI GABBARD HAS LOGGED AT LEAST 2% IN SEVERAL DOZEN POLES BUT THE DNC DOES NOT WANT HER ON THE DEBATE STAGE AND THEY ARE CLAIMING NOW THAT THOSE POLES ARE NOT CERTIFIED POLES SO GARBER LIKELY WON’T MAKE THE NEXT ROUND OF THE PRIMARY DEBATES. MICHAEL TRACY HAS BEEN FOLLOWING THIS FROM THE VERY BEGINNING GRITTY JOINTS TONIGHT. SO, I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY HOW MANY OF OUR VIEWERS ARE GOING TO VOTE FOR TULSI GABBARD, PROBABLY NONE. BUT WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT TULSI GABBARD IS A VALUABLE VOICE AND WE SHOULD HEAR FROM TULSI GABBARD. AND IT SEEMS TO ME, I DO WANT TO BE PARANOID, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY, THEY DON’T WANT HER VOICE INCLUDED. AM I BEING A CONSPIRACY PERSON?>>YOU MIGHT BE SURPRISE, SHE DOES TEND TO GENERATE ACTUALLY A SOMEWHAT SIGNIFICANT AMONG EVEN CONSERVATIVES AND LIBERTARIANS NOTWITHSTANDING THE FACT THAT SHE HAS A FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD LEFT-WING POLICY AGENDA BUT SHE HAS SOMETHING ABOUT HER, I DON’T KNOW, AMBIENCE THAT DRAWS AN IDIOSYNCRATIC RANGE OF SUPPORT FROM ACROSS THE SPECTRUM AND I THINK THAT HAS ROBBED CERTAIN PEOPLE THE WRONG WAY. I’M NOT GONNA ALLEGE A CONSPIRACY AS TO WHY SHE IS LIKELY TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE NEXT DEBATE BUT I AM GOING TO ALLEGE THAT THE CRITERIA TO THE DNC IS USING TO DETERMINE WHO IS INCLUDED AND WHO IS EXCLUDED IS LAUGHABLY ARBITRARY. AS I MENTIONED IN AN ARTICLE THAT I WROTE THIS WEEK AND A REAL CLEAR POLITICS, GABBARD HAS GOTTEN OVER THE REQUIRED BULLING THRESHOLD IN TWO SEPARATE POLES AND TWO SEPARATE EARLY PRIMARY STATES. “THE BOSTON GLOBE” AS A NEWSPAPER WITH THE WIDEST CIRCULATION IN NEW HAMPSHIRE AND THE POST AND COURIER IS THE NEWSPAPER WITH THE WILDEST CIRCULATION IN. GABBARD HAS GOT HER PLACE AT 2% OR MORE IN BOTH PUBLISHED BY THOSE TWO NEWSPAPERS BUT THE DNC AND ITS BIZARRE MYSTERIOUS INFINITE WISDOM HAS DECREED AGAIN ARBITRARILY THAT THOSE POLES ARE NOT APPROVED. THEY ARE NOT, YOU KNOW, THEY DON’T SATISFY SOME WEIRD CRITERIA THAT THAT NOBODY CAN QUITE ASCERTAIN SO WHILE I’M NOT GOING TO ALLEGE AN OVERT CONSPIRACY ALTHOUGH IT’S TRUE THAT EVERYBODY FROM DAWN OF A ZERO TWO ELIZABETH WARREN ALLEGE THAT THE PREVIOUS PRIMARY CYCLE WAS QUOTE, RIGGED. BUT, YOU’D BE FORGIVEN FOR HAVING THAT IMPRESSION GIVEN HOW OBSCURE AND SORT OF INSCRUTABLE THE CRITERIA THAT THE DNC IS USING THIS TIME AROUND TO IT I’M NOT SAYING THAT SULCI SHOULD NECESSARILY HAVE SPECIAL PRIVILEGES OR THAT THE RULES WEREN’T LAID OUT A MONTH AGO WHICH THEY WERE ABOUT THE RULES DON’T SEEM TO HOLD UP TO ANY KIND OF LOGICAL SCRUTINY. THAT’S THE PROBLEM.>>Tucker: AND WE KNOW FOR A FACT THEY DESPISE HER BECAUSE SHE’S CHALLENGED THEIR

100 Comments

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *